<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Frameworks on RoadmapOne Blog</title>
    <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/categories/frameworks/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Frameworks on RoadmapOne Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://roadmap.one/blog/categories/frameworks/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Objective Prioritisation, The Science of Sequencing Strategy</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-objective-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-objective-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>Objective prioritisation is the brutal art of choosing which objectives to fund first. Learn how RICE, ICE, WSJF, MoSCoW, NPV, ARR, Kano, Cost of Delay, Payback Period, Buy a Feature, ROI, Benefit, and more turn infinite backlogs into executable roadmaps.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Tagging, The Missing Connectivity between your backlog and The Board</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-objective-tagging/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-objective-tagging/</guid>
      <description>A unifying guide on how roadmap tagging turns strategy into daily decisions, accelerates board alignment, and becomes effortless with RoadmapOne.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Key Result Tagging, The Science of Measuring What Matters</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-key-result-tagging/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-key-result-tagging/</guid>
      <description>Transform how you measure success—Key Result tagging reveals whether you&amp;rsquo;re measuring the right things, with the right confidence, using the right methods.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ansoff Matrix: Strategic Tagging for Growth Risk, Not Prioritisation</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-17-ansoff-matrix/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-17-ansoff-matrix/</guid>
      <description>The Ansoff Matrix categorises growth strategies by risk profile—Market Penetration, Market Development, Product Development, Diversification. It&amp;rsquo;s a tagging framework for visualising portfolio balance, not a prioritisation framework.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dot Voting Has No Business Near Your Roadmap</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-22-dot-voting/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-22-dot-voting/</guid>
      <description>Dot Voting is everywhere—design sprints, retros, roadmap workshops. It belongs in facilitation, not prioritisation. Here&amp;rsquo;s why democracy produces roadmaps that reflect politics, not value.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Elements of Value Pyramid: Interesting Theory, Limited Practice</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-16-elements-of-value/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-16-elements-of-value/</guid>
      <description>Bain&amp;rsquo;s Elements of Value pyramid—30 types of value from functional to life-changing—is an interesting academic framework and training aid. It&amp;rsquo;s not useful for actual roadmap prioritisation. Skip it for practical work; reference it for product thinking discussions.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GE-McKinsey Matrix: Board-Level Portfolio Strategy, Not Feature Prioritisation</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-23-ge-mckinsey-matrix/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-23-ge-mckinsey-matrix/</guid>
      <description>The GE-McKinsey Matrix helps boards decide which product lines deserve investment. It&amp;rsquo;s portfolio strategy, not feature prioritisation—here&amp;rsquo;s when the 9-box grid earns its complexity over simpler alternatives.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>HEART Framework: Tag Your Roadmap for User-Centred Balance</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-14-heart-framework/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-14-heart-framework/</guid>
      <description>Google&amp;rsquo;s HEART framework—Happiness, Engagement, Adoption, Retention, Task Success—provides user-centred metrics coverage. Use it as a tagging framework to ensure your roadmap is balanced across UX dimensions, not just shipping features.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Leading vs Lagging Indicators: Know If You&#39;re Winning Before It&#39;s Too Late</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-10-leading-lagging-indicators/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-10-leading-lagging-indicators/</guid>
      <description>Leading indicators predict success; lagging indicators confirm it. Good OKRs pair lagging Objectives with leading Key Results—so you know whether you&amp;rsquo;re on track before it&amp;rsquo;s too late to course-correct.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>North Star Metric: One Metric to Align Them All</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-18-north-star-metric/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-18-north-star-metric/</guid>
      <description>Your North Star Metric is the single metric that captures core value delivery to customers. Tag Objectives in RoadmapOne to see what percentage of your roadmap directly targets your North Star—and whether the balance is right.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Product Lifecycle Stage: The Tag That Changes Everything About Prioritisation</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-25-product-lifecycle-stage/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-25-product-lifecycle-stage/</guid>
      <description>Product Lifecycle Stage—Introduction, Growth, Maturity, Decline—is a tagging framework that changes how you interpret prioritisation scores. A high-BRICE initiative for a declining product might still be the wrong investment.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PULSE Framework: The Outdated Metrics Model Your Dashboard Might Still Follow</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-15-pulse-framework/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-15-pulse-framework/</guid>
      <description>PULSE (Page views, Uptime, Latency, Seven-day active users, Earnings) is the outdated metrics framework that HEART replaced. It&amp;rsquo;s still useful as a diagnostic—if your dashboard looks like PULSE, you&amp;rsquo;re missing user-centred measurement.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stack Ranking: The Prioritisation Panacea That Never Works</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-33-stack-ranking/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-33-stack-ranking/</guid>
      <description>Stack ranking feels like the ultimate prioritisation solution—just order everything from 1 to N and execute. In practice, it ignores capacity, dependencies, and team skills. The item ranked last often must be built before the item ranked first. Roadmaps are art as much as science.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Technical Debt Classification: Internal Insight, Not Board Governance</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-9-technical-debt-classification/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-9-technical-debt-classification/</guid>
      <description>Technical debt classification helps Product &amp;amp; Engineering teams understand debt composition—but don&amp;rsquo;t expect board engagement on categories. Tag debt-related Key Results by type (deliberate vs accidental, business-blocking vs aesthetic) when debt is a significant problem requiring structured remediation.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 100 Dollar Test Is an Alignment Tool Disguised as Prioritisation</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-21-100-dollar-test/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-21-100-dollar-test/</guid>
      <description>The 100 Dollar Test forces trade-offs by giving stakeholders fake money to allocate. It&amp;rsquo;s better for alignment than prioritisation—the real value is the conversation it creates, not the numbers it produces.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Eisenhower Matrix Has No Place in Roadmap Planning</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-19-eisenhower-matrix/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-19-eisenhower-matrix/</guid>
      <description>The Eisenhower Matrix isn&amp;rsquo;t a prioritisation framework—it&amp;rsquo;s vocabulary. Learn when the Urgent/Important grid helps board conversations and when it creates dangerous blind spots in your roadmap.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>User Story Mapping: Tag Key Results by User Journey Stage</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-8-user-story-mapping/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-8-user-story-mapping/</guid>
      <description>User Story Mapping isn&amp;rsquo;t prioritisation—it&amp;rsquo;s a tagging framework. The backbone represents user journey stages; tagging Key Results by backbone position shows which parts of the customer experience you&amp;rsquo;re measuring. Use it alongside Pirate Metrics for complete journey visibility.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weighted Scoring Is Subjectivity Wrapped in a Veneer of Objectivity</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-20-weighted-scoring/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-20-weighted-scoring/</guid>
      <description>Weighted Scoring promises customised prioritisation through bespoke criteria and adjustable weights. In practice, it usually produces score-gaming theatre. Learn when it works, when it fails, and why simpler frameworks usually win.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Prioritisation: BRICE</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-7-brice-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-7-brice-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>BRICE extends RICE with Business Importance—forcing teams to explicitly score strategic alignment before reach and impact. Stop building high-impact features that don&amp;rsquo;t matter to the business.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pirate Metrics (AARRR): Dave McClure&#39;s Growth Funnel for Product Teams</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-4-pirate-metrics/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-4-pirate-metrics/</guid>
      <description>Dave McClure&amp;rsquo;s AARRR Pirate Metrics framework (Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Referral, Revenue) reveals where your funnel leaks. Includes an Uber Eats case study, key formulas for each stage, and how to tag your roadmap for board-level visibility.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OKRs for Product Teams: Why Most Implementations Fail (And How to Fix Yours)</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog4-okrs-for-product-teams/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog4-okrs-for-product-teams/</guid>
      <description>76% of product teams attempt OKRs. Only 28% are satisfied with the results. Here&amp;rsquo;s how to be in the 28%—with practical frameworks for objectives, key results, and roadmap connection.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Tagging: Opex vs Capex</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-13-opex-vs-capex/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-13-opex-vs-capex/</guid>
      <description>Help your finance team understand capital vs operational spend across your roadmap, enabling smarter budget allocation and tax planning.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Prioritisation: Benefit</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-17-benefit-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-17-benefit-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>Benefit prioritisation ranks objectives by pure value delivered—revenue gained or costs saved—over 12, 18, or 24 months. No ratios, no formulas, just pounds. The simplest framework the board will actually understand.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Prioritisation: ROI (Return on Investment)</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-16-roi-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-16-roi-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>ROI prioritisation ranks objectives by benefit-to-cost ratio over 12, 18, or 24 months—simpler than NPV, more financially credible than gut instinct. When finance demands numbers but won&amp;rsquo;t accept spreadsheet theatre.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Prioritisation: ARR</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-11-arr-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-11-arr-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>ARR prioritisation ranks features by the recurring revenue at stake—letting your highest-value customers vote with their wallets. When does revenue-driven roadmapping create strategic clarity, and when does it turn your product into a consulting service?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Prioritisation: Buy a Feature</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-15-buy-a-feature-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-15-buy-a-feature-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>Buy a Feature prioritisation turns stakeholder alignment into a budgeting game—give them fake money, price features by cost, let them buy what matters. Works brilliantly until the exec with the loudest voice monopolises the budget.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Prioritisation: Cost of Delay</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-13-cost-of-delay-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-13-cost-of-delay-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>Cost of Delay prioritisation quantifies the economic damage from waiting—then divides by duration to find maximum value per time. Every week you delay shipping costs £X. Which features cost the most to postpone?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Prioritisation: Kano</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-12-kano-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-12-kano-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>Kano prioritisation sequences features by customer satisfaction psychology: Must-Haves first (or your product isn&amp;rsquo;t viable), then Performance, then Delighters. Ship the basics before chasing wow moments.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Prioritisation: NPV</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-10-npv-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-10-npv-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>NPV prioritisation brings finance-grade rigour to roadmap decisions by calculating the present value of future cash flows. When should product teams embrace the spreadsheet complexity—and when should they run?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Prioritisation: Payback Period</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-14-payback-period-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-14-payback-period-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>Payback Period prioritisation ranks features by time to recover investment—the CFO&amp;rsquo;s favourite metric because it answers &amp;lsquo;when do I get my money back?&amp;rsquo; Simpler than NPV, more intuitive than IRR, but blind to what happens after break-even.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Prioritisation: ICE</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-2-ice-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-2-ice-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>Sean Ellis&amp;rsquo;s ICE framework—Impact × Confidence × Ease—is RICE&amp;rsquo;s scrappy younger sibling. Built for speed over precision, ICE thrives when startups need decisions today, not perfect data tomorrow.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Prioritisation: Manual</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-5-manual-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-5-manual-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>Manual prioritisation—a simple 1-10 scale—is what you use when frameworks feel like theatre and executive judgment beats algorithmic scoring. It&amp;rsquo;s not surrender; it&amp;rsquo;s pragmatism about how decisions actually get made.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Prioritisation: MoSCoW</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-3-moscow-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-3-moscow-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>MoSCoW—Must have, Should have, Could have, Won&amp;rsquo;t have—is prioritisation stripped to its brutal essence. Perfect for fixed deadlines when stakeholders need to see exactly what gets cut if the timeline slips.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Prioritisation: PIE</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-9-pie-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-9-pie-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>Chris Goward&amp;rsquo;s PIE framework—Potential × Importance × Ease—prioritises experiments and features by upside if successful. Built for growth teams optimising conversion, now used everywhere fast decisions matter.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Prioritisation: RICE</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-1-rice-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-1-rice-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>Intercom&amp;rsquo;s RICE framework—Reach × Impact × Confidence ÷ Effort—turns gut instinct into quantitative roadmap decisions. Learn when RICE is your best weapon, and when it betrays you.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Opportunity Scoring (Ulwick): The JTBD Prioritisation Framework That Finds Unmet Customer Needs</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-8-opportunity-scoring/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-8-opportunity-scoring/</guid>
      <description>Ulwick&amp;rsquo;s Opportunity Scoring formula (Importance + max(Importance − Satisfaction, 0)) finds the customer needs competitors miss. A practical guide to the Strategyn/JTBD prioritisation framework—with worked examples and implementation steps.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Value vs Complexity Matrix: The Visual Prioritisation Framework for Product Teams</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-6-value-complexity-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-6-value-complexity-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>The Value vs Complexity Matrix is a visual 2×2 prioritisation grid that sorts every objective into Quick Wins, Major Projects, Fill-ins, or Money Pits. Plot value against complexity and see your entire roadmap at a glance.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WSJF Prioritisation: Cost of Delay ÷ Job Size (Weighted Shortest Job First)</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-4-wsjf-prioritisation/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog8-4-wsjf-prioritisation/</guid>
      <description>WSJF (Weighted Shortest Job First) prioritises by Cost of Delay divided by Job Size. The formula: (Business Value + Time Criticality + Risk Reduction) ÷ Job Size. A practical guide to the SAFe prioritisation framework—with worked examples, Fibonacci scoring, and when WSJF fails.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Tagging: Gartner&#39;s Run / Grow / Transform Model</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-1-run-grow-transform/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 14:04:40 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-1-run-grow-transform/</guid>
      <description>Gartner&amp;rsquo;s Run Grow Transform (RGT) model categorises roadmap work into three portfolio buckets. A pragmatic guide to the model, with real allocation examples, board-level analytics, and how to tag objectives in RoadmapOne.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Key Result Tagging: Committed vs Stretch Goals</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-3-committed-vs-stretch-goals/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-3-committed-vs-stretch-goals/</guid>
      <description>Master the OKR fundamental that Google lives by—Committed goals demand 100% delivery, Stretch goals target 60-70% ambition—so boards and teams finally speak the same language about expectations.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Key Result Tagging: Confidence Level %</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-5-confidence-level-percent/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-5-confidence-level-percent/</guid>
      <description>Track evolving confidence (0-100%) in achieving each key result—not as a static guess but as a living signal for when to double down, pivot, or pull the plug before it&amp;rsquo;s too late.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Key Result Tagging: Level of Ambition</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-2-level-of-ambition/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-2-level-of-ambition/</guid>
      <description>Signal where teams stretch versus deliver with certainty—Low, Medium, High ambition, or High Integrity Commitments—so stakeholders calibrate expectations and debates shift from blame to learning.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Key Result Tagging: Metric Type</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-7-metric-type/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-7-metric-type/</guid>
      <description>Balance numbers with nuance—tag key results as Quantitative (metrics), Qualitative (insights), or Boolean (yes/no outcomes) to ensure you&amp;rsquo;re not optimising spreadsheets while missing the stories that matter.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Key Result Tagging: Outcome vs Output vs Input</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-4-outcome-vs-output-vs-input/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-4-outcome-vs-output-vs-input/</guid>
      <description>Stop celebrating deliverables while impact stalls—tag key results as Outcomes (impact achieved), Outputs (deliverables produced), or Inputs (activities performed) to measure what actually moves the business.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Key Result Tagging: R&amp;D Tax Credit</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-1-r-and-d-tax-credit/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-1-r-and-d-tax-credit/</guid>
      <description>Turn qualifying R&amp;amp;D work into tax relief by tagging key results that prove technical uncertainty, systematic investigation, and genuine innovation—making claims audit-ready before HMRC comes knocking.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Key Result Tagging: Validation Method</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-6-validation-method/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog7-6-validation-method/</guid>
      <description>Distinguish hypothesis-driven experiments from assumption-based guesses—tag how you&amp;rsquo;re validating key results to expose which teams build on data and which gamble on intuition.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>McKinsey&#39;s Three Horizons of Growth: H1, H2 &amp; H3 Framework Explained</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-2-three-horizons-of-growth/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-2-three-horizons-of-growth/</guid>
      <description>McKinsey&amp;rsquo;s Three Horizons of Growth framework (H1, H2, H3) defines how to balance short-term core business, mid-term emerging opportunities, and long-term transformational bets. Tag your roadmap by horizon to ensure you&amp;rsquo;re investing across all three time frames.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Tagging: Core vs Context</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-8-core-vs-context/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-8-core-vs-context/</guid>
      <description>How Geoffrey Moore&amp;rsquo;s Core-versus-Context distinction helps SaaS leaders protect differentiation, outsource the ordinary, and explain tough resourcing calls to the board.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Tagging: Customer Journey Stage</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-11-customer-journey-stage/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-11-customer-journey-stage/</guid>
      <description>Map your roadmap to the customer lifecycle—Awareness, Consideration, Conversion, Retention—and ensure balanced investment across every stage from first touch to loyal advocate.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Tagging: Jobs-to-be-Done</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-12-jobs-to-be-done/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-12-jobs-to-be-done/</guid>
      <description>Stop building features and start hiring your product for jobs—Functional tasks, Emotional desires, and Social aspirations—that reveal why customers truly choose you.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Tagging: Kano Maps</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-10-kano/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-10-kano/</guid>
      <description>Leveraging the Kano model—Must-Have, Performance, and Delighter attributes—to balance foundational reliability with wow moments on the product roadmap.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Tagging: SAFe Enablers vs Business Features</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-3-safe-enabler-vs-business-work/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-3-safe-enabler-vs-business-work/</guid>
      <description>Demystifying SAFe&amp;rsquo;s Enabler-type backlog items and showing product teams how explicit tagging sharpens conversations with technical architects and boards alike.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Tagging: The Balanced Scorecard</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-5-balanced-scorecard/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-5-balanced-scorecard/</guid>
      <description>Translating Kaplan &amp;amp; Norton&amp;rsquo;s Balanced Scorecard into a roadmap-tagging lens that aligns product portfolios with strategy through Financial, Customer, Internal Process, and Learning &amp;amp; Growth perspectives.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Objective Tagging: The BCG Product Portfolio: Stars, Cows, Question Marks, Dogs</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-9-bcg-growth-share-matrix/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-9-bcg-growth-share-matrix/</guid>
      <description>Applying the classic BCG Growth-Share Matrix (Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, Dogs) to product portfolios and showing how roadmap tagging clarifies funding bets.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SVPG&#39;s Four Product Risks: Value, Usability, Feasibility &amp; Viability (Marty Cagan)</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-6-svpg-product-risks/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-6-svpg-product-risks/</guid>
      <description>Marty Cagan&amp;rsquo;s SVPG four product risks—Value, Usability, Feasibility, and Business Viability—give product teams a framework for de-risking every roadmap item. Tag objectives by risk type to focus discovery where it matters most.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Innovation Ambition Matrix: Core, Adjacent &amp; Transformational (70-20-10)</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-7-innovation-ambition-matrix/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog6-7-innovation-ambition-matrix/</guid>
      <description>The Innovation Ambition Matrix (Nagji &amp;amp; Tuff, HBR 2012) splits your roadmap into Core (70%), Adjacent (20%), and Transformational (10%) initiatives. The twist? Returns follow the inverse ratio—70% of long-term returns come from Transformational. Here&amp;rsquo;s how to tag, track, and rebalance your innovation portfolio.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
