<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>MVP on RoadmapOne</title>
    <link>https://roadmap.one/tags/mvp/</link>
    <description>Recent content in MVP on RoadmapOne</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://roadmap.one/tags/mvp/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>MVP vs MLP vs MVA: Minimum Viable, Lovable, or Awesome?</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog44-7-mvp-mlp-mva/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog44-7-mvp-mlp-mva/</guid>
      <description>MVP, MLP, or MVA? Frank Robinson&amp;rsquo;s Minimum Viable Product was designed to learn, not ship. Brian de Haaff&amp;rsquo;s Minimum Lovable Product added an emotional bar. Minimum Viable Awesome (or Minimum Awesome Product) argues that in 2026 &amp;lsquo;minimum&amp;rsquo; is the wrong target entirely. When building is nearly free, the only defensible goal is magnificent in at least one dimension — your crown jewel.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Culture of Adequacy: Your Customers Don&#39;t Want Minimum — They Want Magnificent</title>
      <link>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog36-culture-of-adequacy/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roadmap.one/blog/posts/blog36-culture-of-adequacy/</guid>
      <description>Many teams have been conditioned into adequacy: shipping the bare minimum of everything and the full potential of nothing. Here&amp;rsquo;s the spectrum from Minimum Product to Maximally Awesome Product, and why your crown jewels deserve obsessive, beautiful, category-killing investment.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
